Caractéristiques de l'objet
-
État
-
Neuf sans étiquettes
-
Commentaires du vendeur
-
“70s Vintage (mint condition)”
-
Brand
-
Sundazed (Spain)
-
Size Type
-
Regular
-
Department
-
Women
-
Type
-
Pants
-
Size
-
8
-
Color
-
Brown
-
Style
-
Dress Pants
-
MPN
-
Hermès, Roland Mouret, Celine Phoebe Philo, Yves Saint Laurent, Self-Portrait, Balmain, Bottega Veneta, Chanel, Andrew Gn, Rebecca Vallance, Celine, Doen, Romeo Gigli, Claude Montana, Gianfranco Ferre, Jaeger, Etienne Aigner, Lemaire, Dries Van Noten, Maison Ullens, Cristaseya, LE17SEPTEMBRE, Meryll Rogge, BITE Studios, Harris Wharf London, Rejina Pyo, Jil Sander, Co, Plan C, ARTS & SCIENCE, Totême, Glenurquhart Check, Glen Plaid, 1960s, 1970s, Savile Row, Rhodiaceta, Campsa, Licona, Forster Rohner, Lainière de Roubaix
-
Vintage
-
Yes
Neuf sans étiquettes
SUNDAZED & OUTSIDE SOCIETY
...Flat-fronted and straight-cut with a slight flare, the silhouette reflects 1960s–70s formalwear archetypes rooted in practical elegance and professional neutrality.
The mid-rise Glen plaid trousers constructed from Tergal fabric represent a masterclass in mid-20th-century European industrial tailoring, where precision engineering met textile innovation to produce garments of understated refinement and utilitarian integrity. Lacking a visible fashion house or designer signature, the garment instead reveals its lineage through the internal label “TERGAL MARCA REGISTRADA”—a textile identifier referencing the proprietary polyester fiber developed by Rhône-Poulenc in France and widely disseminated across European textile networks from the 1950s onward. Far from a peripheral footnote, Tergal’s presence anchors these trousers within a pivotal historical moment in fabric development, wherein synthetic fibers began to replace natural ones in commercial tailoring, delivering low-maintenance, crease-resistant garments to a newly mobile, economically ascendant middle class. Designed within the formalwear typology of flat-front tailored trousers, the garment exhibits all the hallmarks of late-1960s to early-1970s patterning: a structured waistband with extended tab closure, clean front with no pleats, straight-cut legs subtly flaring below the knee, and restrained surface detailing. The cut privileges visual neutrality and semi-fitted elegance, appropriate for officewear. Constructed with lockstitch assembly throughout, the trousers are engineered with a shaped waistband, reinforced via internal bar-tacks, and fused with interfacing for dimensional control. A full waistband curtain lines the interior, finished in pale cream with bias-bound seams—an uncommon but elevated choice for mass tailoring that reflects a holdover from traditional suiting construction methods. Fly construction follows a classic model: a RELAMPAGO brand metal zipper—Spanish-made—is set with a flush alignment along a reinforced fly shield, aided by internal twill tape to absorb stress at the base. The hook-and-bar fastening system is mounted on an extended waistband tab, riveted through reinforced layers for security, and possibly supported by an internal button for load distribution. Belt loops, topstitched and bar-tacked post waistband assembly, preserve the check’s visual alignment and enhance belt function without structural compromise. Pocket bags are composed of dense cotton twill, their seams French-stitched at entry and potentially flat-felled where joined to the main panels—an unusually robust construction strategy for trousers at this industrial tier. Internally, the finishing exceeds expectations for mass tailoring: side seams are overlocked, but key structural junctures—waistband, fly guard, and pocket intersections—are all bias-bound to control fraying, reduce bulk, and extend wear longevity. The stitching is clean and consistent throughout, with a calibrated stitch length of approximately 2.5 to 3 mm, ensuring seam strength without distorting the fabric’s surface. The trousers are unlined, a decision made not out of omission but as a calculated response to the density and stability of the Tergal blend, which requires neither lining for opacity nor reinforcement for form. The textile composition—a 2/2 twill blend of polyester and wool, likely in a 55/45 or 65/35 ratio—embodies the industrial suiting ethos of the mid-century. With a GSM of approximately 260–280, the fabric is firm, lightly brushed, and crisp to the touch. It bears a large-scale Glen check, alternating black, brown, and grey yarns into a matrix of staggered houndstooth blocks and windowpane overchecks. The tight yarn twist and plain worsted base offer both visual clarity and durability, while the wool component introduces breathability and structure, and the polyester ensures shape retention, wrinkle resistance, and ease of laundering—core attributes prized by the European business and uniform-wearing populations of the era. Pattern matching is executed with exacting care across fly seams, waistband joins, and belt loop placements. The check alignment is uninterrupted at key visual planes, including the center front rise and rear dart zones, reinforcing the trousers’ formal clarity and elevating their industrial precision. Waist shaping is achieved not through pleats or elaborate volume control but via subtle back darts and the structural manipulation of side seams—a drafting logic consistent with late-Modernist tailoring, privileging contour through form rather than excess fabric. The trousers’ historical context locates them squarely in the late 1960s to early 1970s, a period of dramatic transformation in European garment production, when Francoist Spain, among other regional economies, expanded export tailoring for Western markets. The zip brand, the size label and the overall construction logic point to Spanish manufacture, likely within an industrial tailoring facility calibrated to the specifications of state or commercial contracts. These trousers were not bespoke, yet their execution—curtain waistband, bound seams, reinforced fly, perfectly aligned Glen check—reveals a standard of tailoring that exceeds modern fast fashion norms and echoes the pre-automation discipline of postwar garment production. In terms of aesthetic and cultural interpretation, the trousers serve as a material response to post-war aspirations for modernity, formality, and masculine propriety. The use of Tergal—not merely a fiber but an emblem of post-industrial innovation—signifies a desire to merge traditional dress codes with futuristic maintenance freedom. The Glen plaid, stripped of its aristocratic roots and executed here in a crisp, machine-friendly format, becomes a democratized motif of mid-century professionalism—no longer exclusive, but accessible and reproducible. Today, these trousers occupy a compelling space within the broader narrative of archival minimalism and mid-century utilitarian design. Their clean-cut silhouette, durable fiber structure, and faultless construction make them viable for vintage resale, historical study, or direct inspiration in contemporary tailoring. Brands such as Lemaire, Dries Van Noten, and Celine have revived similar silhouettes and textiles in recent collections, underscoring the enduring design logic embedded within garments such as this. Their value lies not in flamboyance or rarity, but in their masterful equilibrium of structure, clarity, and technical soundness. As both garment and artifact, they reflect an era when industrial tailoring could deliver elegance without extravagance and performance without aesthetic compromise.
The trouser, rendered in a Tergal polyester-wool blend, encapsulates the precise intersection of ideological constraint and structural intentionality within the late-industrial reforms of Francoist Spain. Its sharply delineated wide-leg silhouette, centered by pressed creases and devoid of pleats, tabs, or decorative flourishes, reflects a visual grammar rooted in civic modernity—a sartorial lexicon that prioritizes formal integrity over expressive excess. The garment’s architecture is an exercise in sovereign restraint: an authoritative clarity expressed not through flamboyance but through an unwavering commitment to proportion, tension, and compositional discipline. The staggered houndstooth pattern—heritage by origin, yet conceptually unorthodox in its spatial rhythm—disrupts the traditional cadence of menswear check motifs. Rather than reiterating legacy, the motif recalibrates it, forming a dialectical textile surface that echoes the pattern subversions of Romeo Gigli and Claude Montana while engaging the calculated irregularities of Meryll Rogge and LE17SEPTEMBRE. Its complexity does not entertain; it informs—rendering heritage as a medium of conceptual disturbance rather than decorative continuity. This aesthetic philosophy extends through the entire garment, which eschews spectacle in favor of a profound structural legibility. At the core of this construction lies Tergal: a dry-hand, synthetically reinforced polyester-wool blend emblematic of postwar material engineering. Developed to satisfy the Franco regime’s export-oriented modernization agenda, Tergal was selected for its dimensional stability, stiffness, colorfastness, and crease retention—qualities prized not merely for their practical value but for their alignment with a broader infrastructural ideology of resilience, regulation, and visual uniformity. In this context, Tergal becomes more than fabric; it is a geopolitical substrate—a material index of industrial aspiration and civic authority. The trousers’ tailored rigidity and synthetically calibrated drape enable the silhouette to perform with architectural gravity. Space is not occupied casually; it is delineated, held, and controlled. The wide-leg configuration does not gesture toward movement but anchors the body within a zone of spatial command. This is tailoring as structural imposition—a formalism that parallels the early work of Phoebe Philo at Céline, the calibrated silence of Hermès, and the fabric-first philosophies of Maison Ullens and Cristaseya. Such design does not rely on assertion through detail but through discipline—an exacting quiet that speaks louder than display. The internal construction further evidences this ethos. A faced waistband executed in contrasting cloth, though invisible when worn, embodies the technical clarity and internal logic found in British tailoring and in the reductive architectural language of Jaeger and Gianfranco Ferré. It aligns conceptually with the hidden structural commitments seen in Plan C and Co, where internal design becomes a communicative act. This mode of inward-facing authorship, rejecting decorative announcement in favor of material intentionality, reflects the design philosophies of BITE Studios and ARTS & SCIENCE—where structural opacity becomes a virtue, and silence becomes a form of articulation. Throughout, the design demonstrates a refusal of expressive ornament in favor of what might be termed intellectual minimalism. There is no piping, no embellishment, no external adornment. What remains is compositional clarity, resonant with the early work of Jil Sander Navy and the spatial restraint of Totême. The result is a silhouette that resists flamboyant femininity in favor of bureaucratic poise—conveying neither seduction nor submission, but presence. The garment thus positions itself within the realm of architectural careerwear: not as nostalgic pastiche or revisionist subversion, but as a deliberate system of formal and ideological expression. Situated within the textile-industrial apparatus of 1970s Spain—where centralized planning met capitalist export ambitions—the trousers are both product and artifact. Their composure is not accidental but politically encoded, a sartorial index of national industrial ambition translated through pattern, fiber, and form. The choice to avoid theatricality mirrors the quiet authority of Harris Wharf London’s unlined outerwear, the syntactic repurposing of menswear codes by Rejina Pyo, and the edited volumetric gestures of Doen and Self-Portrait. These are garments that do not chase visibility but command precision—each line, crease, and edge a function of engineering rather than flair. In this refusal to display, the trousers achieve a rare condition: a mode of elegance that does not seek applause but endures through clarity of construction and philosophical coherence. Their ideological middle ground—neither politicized nor neutral—enables them to function as modernist uniform rather than costume. They do not perform modernity; they house it. In doing so, they align with the latent codes of Bottega Veneta, the pattern-based semiotics of Chanel, and the early modernist silhouettes of Balmain—where restraint is not a concession but the purest expression of control. Ultimately, this garment is not merely an artifact of its time but a blueprint for structural civility: a prototype of tailoring that frames the wearer without spectacle and articulates presence through material logic. It is not performative. It is declarative—designed not to entertain but to endure, to structure, and to signify. A garment for which relevance is not derived from trend but from its precise, unwavering allegiance to form, material, and the politics of containment. It is, in every seam and fiber, a masterclass in sartorial restraint—where textile, tailoring, and ideology converge into a singular, enduring articulation of industrial elegance.
Measurements (cm):
Waist: 40
Inseam: 80
Outseam: 105
Opening: 27
Size Conversion (approximate)
US Women’s Size: 8
EU Women’s Size: 40
SKU: 005694